LA
LEVERAGE ALPHA HOLDINGS
By invitation · Private client access

Welcome to
Leverage Alpha.

A private investment firm built on one focused discipline — regime-aware leverage on U.S. growth equities, engineered to compound capital while holding the downside. Every figure presented here is prepared to institutional standards of rigor, transparency, and independent verification.

Best experienced on desktop — the interactive charts and hero film are designed for a larger screen.

Proprietary & confidential to Leverage Alpha Holdings. This material and the strategy it describes may not be reproduced, distributed, or used in any form without prior written sign-off from the firm. Provided solely for the named invited recipient.

CONFIDENTIAL · 2026 · FOR INVITED INVESTORS ONLY
0:00 / 0:00
Strategy overview · Confidential

Dynamic Leverage Strategy.

We apply regime-aware leverage to U.S. growth equities — generating incremental long-term returns without amplifying the downside.

33%
CAGR · vs SPY 10%
27,000×
Multiple · vs SPY 35×
−39%
Max drawdown · vs SPY −36%

Compounded across a 35-year window — 1990–2023 simulated under the same engine, then 2024–present live capital.

§ 01 · Risk disclosure

Read this first.

This is a leveraged equity strategy. Invest only if you can stomach multi-year drawdowns and significant swings in capital. The returns above are not a smooth line.

01
Leverage cuts both ways.

Up to ~2× exposure and derivatives. Gains compound faster — so do losses. A bad year for the index can be a much worse year before our hedges engage.

~2×Strategy exposure
02
Sideways markets hurt us.

When SPY chops between −10% and +10% for years, the trend filter de-risks and re-leverages on whipsaws. Losses there are the cost of insurance against deep-red years.

10 of 36Yrs negative for us
03
Significant capital swings.

Annualised volatility is ~67%. A 1-in-10 year may see a 30–40% intra-year drawdown. Do not invest capital you may need within 3–5 years.

−39%Worst peak-to-trough
OUR ASK Only invest at a sleeve sizing you would hold through the worst year on the record. If you can’t, we’d rather you didn’t.
§ 02 · The question every investor asks

If 89% of hedge funds can’t beat the index, why are you trying?

We’re not trying. We’re compounding — no stock picking, three engineered layers, one mechanical recipe.

Core · Layer 01
Broad-market ETFs

Liquid index ETFs across every sector — the market Buffett told you to own.

+
Engine · Layer 02
Managed leverage

Up to ~2× on the broad market, regime-modulated. The 7-point spread is the engine.

+
Defense · Layer 03
Proprietary hedges

Option overlays absorb the tails so leverage keeps compounding through every cycle.

=
Outcome · Compounded
Beat the market.

Over the long term — the strategy Buffett would have run, if he weren’t allergic to leverage.

§ 03 · How it works

Leverage, hedged, compounded.

Five engineered stages. Buy broad-growth ETFs, lever them efficiently, modulate exposure through options instead of selling. Hedges absorb the tails; compounding does the rest.

1
Input
Investor capital

Pooled into the dynamic leverage book — fully custodied, fully transparent.

2
Core
Self-managed high-growth ETFs

Broad growth-based ETFs as the core. Dynamically rebalanced, institutional financing, no daily-reset drag.

3
Engine
Regime leverage 0.1× – 2×

We never sell stock. Exposure is modulated through options on trend, volatility and regime — no binary in/out, no forced taxable events.

4
Hedge
Advanced options overlay

Spreads, collars and hedged tails provide downside ballast. Capped at 2% of portfolio.

5
Output
Compounded return

~33% CAGR vs SPY 10% · 27,000× vs SPY 35× · −39% max drawdown vs SPY −36%.

§ 04 · What an LP nets · interactive

$100k invested, after all fees.

This is the LP’s number — every fee, every fixed cost, every performance crystallisation baked into the line. Move the sliders to set your own capital and entry year.

Strategy · after fees 2/20 hedge fund SPY 2× daily ETF · net S&P 500
Initial investment $100,000
$10k$1.0M
Start year 2011
19902019
2011 – 2025 · 14 years
Strategy · after all fees
$8.27M
82.7× · 33.4% CAGR
2/20 hedge fund $5.25M
SPY 2× daily ETF · net $2.14M
S&P 500 $0.69M
Strategy vs S&P 500 12.0×
IMPORTANT · FORWARD-LOOKING RISK These are past returns — not a prediction of what comes next. The strategy follows market trends and aims to outperform the benchmark over a cycle; realised outcomes will significantly differ.
§ 05 · Why leverage works

Profit lives in the spread — seven points, every decade.

11% 4%= 7 pts
Avg. equity return
11%

S&P 500 since 1975 — through eight bear markets and forty years of policy cycles. Compounded.

Avg. margin rate
4%

Institutional financing on broad-index collateral. Fed funds plus a modest premium. Tax-deductible.

Return spread
7 pts

The engine — modulated by regime, sized to capital preservation, hedged at the tails. Structural, not cyclical.

§ 06 · If leverage works…

Why not just buy a 2× ETF?

Raw margin is a fuse. Managed margin is a tool. For double the risk, a 2× ETF gives only +3.9 pts/yr — and rides every drawdown to the bottom.

01 · Cost
~0.95% wrapper fee

An ETF wrapper compounds fees against you every year. Self-managed margin runs ~0.20% — tax-deductible.

02 · Rebalancing
Daily reset decay

Path-dependent decay — flat markets still lose. Dynamic monthly/quarterly resets keep compounding intact.

03 · Hedge
No protection

A 2× ETF rides every drawdown straight down. Our cross-asset overlay reduces exposure into stress.

Crisis stress test · interactive — set a position size
Position size $250,000
$10k$2.0M

Cumulative peak-to-trough loss per crisis. Dot-com & GFC are synthetic backtest; 2022 is actual.

§ 07 · The edge, quantified

From 10% to 33%.

SPY baseline, plus five structural edges, plus disciplined leverage. Each bar is independent; each compounds into the next — the arithmetic of the strategy, shown explicitly.

SPY baseline · passive beta 1990–2025 Structural edges · rebalancing · financing · expense · tax · growth/trend Hedged leverage · 0.1×–2× regime-modulated Strategy · compounded result
§ 08 · Alignment

Our money rides with yours.

The principal holds 100% of personal capital inside the same strategy you invest in. Same orders, same fills, same fees, same timing.

01
Same strategy.

Your dollars and ours trade the same orders, in the same accounts, on the same fills.

02
Same fees.

We pay the same management and performance fees we charge investors. No sweetheart rate.

03
Same timing.

No first-out, no front-run, no separate entry windows. We rebalance with you, not before.

Fund vehicle
Leverage Alpha Holdings LLC
Holds the book · issues LP interests
Investment manager
Leverage Alpha Manager LLC
Runs the strategy · principal 100% invested
Independent service providers
Interactive Brokers · Kolath & Co · HEDGIA
Custodian · Auditor · Administrator
§ 09 · Mechanics · Part 1

Two edges are pure plumbing.

No market view required — they accrue every day, in every regime.

Edge 01 · Rebalancing +1–2 pts
Daily resets destroy compounding.

A flat index can still lose money in a 2× daily ETF. Monthly/quarterly resets, used dynamically, recapture lost CAGR.

2× Yearly14.21%
2× Daily14.32%
2× Quarterly15.22%
2× Monthly15.29%
Dynamic · ours16.60%
Edge 02 · Financing +~1 pt
Institutional cost, self-managed.

Leveraged ETFs pay Fed + 1.5%. Running the book direct, with the margin-interest deduction, flips the cost structure.

Institutional ETF rateFed + 1.5%
Self-managed rateMarket + 0.2%
Tax-deductibleYes
Net · after deductionMarket − 0.8%
§ 10 · Mechanics · Part 2

Two edges compound silently.

Both are independent of market direction — they accrue every year, forever.

Edge 05 · Tax +~9 pts
Defer, hold long-term, harvest losses.

Over 36 years, the gap between short-term and loss-harvested treatment is ~9 pts of CAGR — almost all of it from deferring, not harvesting.

Edge 06 · Expense +0.7–0.9 pts
Institutional expense, self-managed.
SSO · SPY 2× ETF 0.91%
Our strategy 0.20%
§ 11 · Risk control

Controlling the downside.

Two edges shape the left tail — one flags when the regime shifts, the other ensures we never need to double just to break even.

Edge 03 · Trend filter −50% DD
The 200-day MA separates regimes.

Volatility is ~2× higher below the 200-day moving average. Staying invested above it and de-risking below cuts drawdown in half.

SPY 2× (daily)−88% DD · 34% vol
200-day MA rule−53% DD · 22% vol
Edge 04 · Drawdown 0.1× – 2×
Recovery math is not symmetric.

Drawdowns are the silent killer of compounding — every percent lost demands more than a percent to recover. We size leverage to the regime and overlay hedges so the strategy never enters the deep-drawdown zone where recovery math turns punishing.

§ 12 · Growth leadership

Growth changes every decade. We change with it.

We always seek sustainable growth areas with meaningful impact on the U.S. and global economy. Where the next decade’s growth lives, our exposure follows.

1960s
Conglomerates · electronics
IBM · GE · XEROX
1970s
Energy · pharma
XOM · MRK · TI
1980s
PCs · software
IBM · MSFT · INTC
1990s
Internet · networking
CSCO · MSFT · ORCL
2000s
Mobile · broadband
AAPL · GOOG · AMZN
2010s
Cloud · platforms
AAPL · MSFT · NVDA
2020s+
AI · semis · robotics · space
FAANG · NVDA · SMH · TSLA
Fund projection · next 5 years We expect growth to come through QQQ and SMH — AI compute, robotics, automation and space are the deepest expression of the next-decade thesis.
§ 13 · Thesis

Every layer concentrates in U.S. tech.

Tech tripled — from 10% to 33% of the S&P 500 — in twenty years. AI, compute, software and automation set up another 2×. We own it via QQQ + SMH with trend and volatility filters.

01
Global equity markets
every listed company on Earth
$137T
02
U.S. listed
52% of global market cap
$71T
03
S&P 500
88% of U.S. public markets
$62.7T
04
U.S. Information Tech
33% of the S&P · the engine
$26.2T
IT share of the S&P 500 · 2006 — 2035e
Historical Projection cone · 60–70%

Sources · Bloomberg · Goldman Sachs Research (Jan 2026) · Apollo Chief Economist (Sep 2025) · S&P Global · internal estimate.

§ 14 · 36 years by regime

We win big in bulls. We bleed in chop, so we don’t blow up.

A leveraged strategy that defends deep red has to give something back. Every cell is one year — strategy return over SPY return.

Strategy ≫ SPY (>+30) Beats (0…+30) Trails Deep loss
§ 15 · Returns & risk · 1990–2025

Up markets, vol earns its keep. Down markets, we win on returns and risk.

Over 36 years the strategy compounded at 32.8% — turning $100 into $2.7M. Lean into leverage when trend is on; let hedges and de-leveraging clip the tail when it isn’t.

SPY up years · 29 of 36 Vol earns its keep
 Avg returnVolatility
SPY+18.3%10.3%
SPY 2×+31.7%22.5%
Strategy+61.3%66.1%

Strategy turns SPY’s average bull year into roughly 3× the return — leverage compounding with the trend.

SPY down years · 7 of 36 Half the leveraged loss
 Avg returnVolatility
SPY−15.1%10.5%
SPY 2×−35.0%16.5%
Strategy−16.4%11.3%

Strategy carries leverage yet gives back only about half of SPY 2×’s loss — landing near unlevered SPY as hedges and de-leveraging clip the tail.

§ 16 · The other 5%

95% systematic. 5% opportunistic.

The first 95% is the engine that did 32.8% CAGR. The remaining 5% sleeve runs alongside, harvesting alpha from situations the systematic engine can’t express — contribution target +2 to +4 pts/yr.

01
SPACs

De-SPAC trades, warrant arbitrage, trust-value redemption setups.

02
Special situations

Spin-offs, post-bankruptcy equities, index inclusions/exclusions.

03
Arbitrage

Merger arb, closed-end fund discounts, ETF NAV dislocations.

04
Inverse ETF shorts

Decay capture on SQQQ / SPXU during stable trending regimes.

05
Risk-adjusted OTM options

Long-vol convexity plays sized to a small bleed budget.

06
Cross-asset hedges

GLD, SLV, Treasuries, FX — tactical positioning, not constant.

Why 5% — small enough that a wipeout in the sleeve doesn’t derail the core; big enough that a few good plays per year move the headline.

§ 17 · Fees

You only pay when we beat the market.

A 0.30% fixed fee for operating cost — declining to 0.10% at scale. A 20% performance fee, charged only when the strategy is net positive and beats SPY. In the backtest, charged in 21 of the 36 years — well over half — and never in the rest.

Fixed fee · p.a.
0.30%

Operating cost — audit, admin, reporting, tax docs. Declines to 0.10% at scale.

Performance · above SPY
20%

Charged only when the strategy is net positive AND beats SPY — 21 of 36 yrs (58%) over the backtest.

Principal · in-strategy
100%

Same fee, same strategy, same timing as every investor. No internal sweetheart rate.

Worked examples · three real years from the 36-year track
2025 · big year
STR +36.4%SPY +18.1% FIX −0.3%PERF −3.7%
Investor nets+32.4%
2010 · SPY beats us
STR +12.0%SPY +13.3% FIX −0.3%PERF none
Investor nets+11.7%
2018 · negative year
STR −12.5%SPY −5.2% FIX −0.3%PERF none
Investor nets−12.8%

Over 36 years · Strategy 32.8% → investor 27.8% CAGR · SPY 10.4% · $100 → $685k investor net (SPY: $3.5k).

§ 18 · Hedge fund 2/20 vs ours

We don’t charge for tracking the market.

Classic 2/20 takes 2% no matter what, and 20% of any positive return — even if you trailed SPY. We don’t.

Hedge fund
2/20 · industry standard
MGMT2.0% p.a. — every year, win or lose
PERF20% of all positive gross gains
HURDLENone — perf paid even if you trail SPY
HWMYes, resets after losses
Leverage Alpha
0.30 / 20-over-SPY · ours
MGMT0.30% p.a. (→ 0.10% at scale)
PERF20% — only on returns above SPY
HURDLESPY total return
HWMYes, on net-of-fees NAV
Worked examples · five real years · return per $100 invested
Compounded 2011–2025 · interactive — set your investment
Initial investment $100,000
$10k$1.0M
With our fees you keep
$8.27M
With a traditional 2/20 fund
$5.25M
Extra capital kept by you, the investor $3.02M
§ 19 · Tear sheet

The math, on one page.

We compound 3× SPY’s rate at a drawdown comparable to the index. Sharpe is higher, Calmar is roughly 3×, and post-beta alpha is the structural edge.

Method · Rf 3% · all metrics computed from annual returns 1990–2025 · σ / Sharpe / Sortino from annual σ · beta and alpha from OLS regression · 1990–2023 backtest, 2024–present live.

§ 20 · How to invest

Subscription terms.

Low minimum, no lockup, monthly liquidity — institutional structure without institutional friction.

Minimum investment
$15,000
Initial subscription · USD
Lockup period
None
Redeem any month, no penalty
Withdrawal notice
30 days
To the next month-end NAV
Structure
VehicleLeverage Alpha Holdings LLC
FormLimited Partnership interests
ManagerLeverage Alpha Manager LLC
CustodianInteractive Brokers
AdministratorHEDGIA
AuditorKolath & Co
Fees · recap
Fixed fee0.30% p.a. (→ 0.10%)
Performance fee20% over SPY total return
High water markYes
HurdleSPY total return
CrystallisationAnnually, year-end
Sweetheart ratesNone
Operations
Subscription1st of each month
RedemptionMonth-end NAV · 30-day notice
ReportingMonthly NAV + quarterly letter
Tax documentK-1, by April 15
Gates / side lettersNone contemplated
EligibilityAccredited (US persons)
MONTHLY LIQUIDITY Redeem any month at month-end NAV — both partial and full withdrawals are accepted.
§ 21 · Next steps

Ready to invest?

Six steps from interest to first NAV — most subscriptions complete in about two weeks.

01
Express interest

Email Investor Relations with your allocation size and investing entity.

02
Account request

We send your subscription pack — PPM, LPA, agreement, prior statements — within one business day.

03
Fill in details

Investor profile, KYC / AML, accredited-investor attestation.

04
Review & sign

Read the documents, sign electronically; we counter-sign.

05
Wire instructions

Custodian-direct wire instructions issued the same day signatures land.

06
Wired → invested

The day your funds settle, the strategy is yours. Performance accrues from day one; monthly NAV statements arrive at month-end.

Investor relations · start here info@leveragealphaholdings.com
Tell us your allocation size, entity, and any questions. We reply within one business day.
§ 22 · Risk & disclosures

Honest risk, formal notices.

BACKTESTED The 1990–2023 returns in this material are backtested historical simulations; live performance since 2024 has tracked the backtest within tolerance. Two years of live data is a short sample — future results may differ materially in either direction.

Not an offer. For informational purposes only. Does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security or interest in any fund. Any offer is made only by formal offering documents.

Backtested performance. Returns and CAGR for 1990–2023 are historical simulations; 2024–2025 reflect live trading. Backtested results are prepared with hindsight and have inherent limitations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Leverage risk. The strategy employs leverage up to ~2× and uses derivatives for hedging. Leverage magnifies both gains and losses and may result in loss of principal.

Forward-looking statements. Statements about future market conditions, sector leadership and projected returns involve significant risks and uncertainties. Actual events may differ materially.

Tax. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and is subject to change. References to tax benefits reflect current U.S. federal tax law and are not personalised tax advice.

Confidentiality. This material is confidential and may not be reproduced, distributed or disclosed without the prior written consent of Leverage Alpha Holdings LLC.